GRS Evaluations GMS6792: Peer Evaluations Rate each question: 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Agree; 4 = Strongly Agree GMS6792: New Peer Evaluations Speaker's Name*1. The speaker had practiced the talk.*12342. The speaker did not rely on reading notes or slides.*12343. The speaker controlled his/her nerves, maintained eye contact, and appeared comfortable.*12344. The speaker was enthusiastic and engaging.*12345. The presentation was visually appealing, readable, and consistent.*12346. The hypothesis and big picture were conveyed.*12347. The speaker presented the subject matter in a clear and systematic manner including adequate introduction and explained unfamiliar acronyms/techniques.*12348. Each slide had an anchoring conclusion or tombstone.*12349. The presenter had command of the subject matter in both presentation and question period.*123410. The studies were scientifically rigorous (stats, used controls, accurately presented/interpreted).*123411. The results were compelling, either in supporting or refuting the hypothesis.*123412. The overarching conclusion was effectively conveyed and related to the big picture.*123413. The mentor was involved in the preparation of this presentation.*1234Provide 1-2 sentences as comments. Please indicate which question you are providing additional comments for.*Provide 1-2 sentences as comments. Please indicate which question you are providing additional comments for.*Provide 1-2 sentences as comments. Please indicate which question you are providing additional comments for.*Evaluator Number*Please enter a value between 1 and 34.